Digestibility of amino acids in a new source of distillers dried grains with solubles fed to growing pigs

Distillers dried grains with solubles (DDGS) is a co-product from the dry-grind ethanol production. However, quality and nutrient content of DDGS may differ among sources and origins and new technologies allow for production of DDGS with different chemical compositions as well as nutritional values. Recently a high-protein distillers dried grains (HP-DDG; ProCap DDGS, Marquis Energy, Hennepin, IL) was introduced and the HP-DDG has greater concentrations of CP and fat, but contains less fiber compared with conventional DDGS, which may affect the digestibility of AA in HP-DDG compared with conventional DDGS. There are, however, no data for the digestibility of AA in this new source of DDGS. Therefore, the objective of this research was to test the hypothesis that standardized ileal digestibility (SID) of AA in HP-DDG is greater than in conventional DDGS when fed to growing pigs.

 

Experimental design

Nine growing pigs (initial BW: 67.2 ± 6.4 kg) with a T-cannula installed in the distal ileum were allotted to a triplicate 3 × 3 Latin square design with 3 diets and 3 periods. There were 3 pigs per diet in each period for a total of 9 observations per treatment. Experimental diets included each source of DDGS as the sole source of AA, and a nitrogen-free diet was used to measure the basal endogenous losses of AA.

Each experimental period lasted 6 d. The initial 4 d of each period was considered an adaptation period. Ileal digesta were collected on d 5 and 6 for 9 h using standard procedures. The diets and digesta were analyzed for AA and Cr to calculate the apparent ileal digestibility (AID) of CP and AA in the 2 sources of DDGS. The AID values were then corrected using the basal endogenous losses of CP and AA to calculate the SID values.

Results

Based on 88% DM basis, HP-DDG contained more CP, AA, and acid-hydrolyzed ether extract compared with conventional DDGS (Table 1). The AID and SID of all AA in HP-DDG were greater (P < 0.001) than in conventional DDGS with the exception that the AID and SID of Pro were not different between the 2 sources of DDGS (Table 2).

The very high concentrations of AA and SID values for AA in HP-DDG obtained in this experiment indicate that HP-DDG is of very high quality and may be a great source of digestible AA in diets fed to pigs.

Key points

  • A new source of DDGS (i.e., HP-DDG) contains more CP, AA, and fat compared with conventional DDGS.
  • HP-DDG has greater values for SID of CP and AA compared with conventional DDGS.

 

Table 1. Nutrient composition of HP-DDG and conventional DDGS1

Item, %

HP-DDG

Conventional DDGS

Dry matter

94.6

87.6

Crude protein

48.1

31.1

Acid-hydrolyzed ether extract

9.49

4.14

Indispensable AA

  Arg

2.47

1.35

  His

1.40

0.78

  Ile

2.03

1.13

  Leu

5.57

3.24

  Lys

1.89

1.03

  Met

1.09

0.54

  Phe

2.51

1.33

  Thr

1.89

1.09

  Trp

0.49

0.20

  Val

2.84

1.46

Dispensable AA

  Ala

3.41

2.00

  Asp

3.38

1.94

  Cys

1.00

0.57

  Glu

7.52

4.32

  Gly

2.06

1.17

  Pro

3.52

2.21

  Ser

2.20

1.29

  Tyr

1.90

0.97

d

d

d

1All values except DM were adjusted to 88% DM.

 

Table 2. AID and SID of CP and AA in HP-DDG and conventional DDGS (n  = 9)

 

AID

SID1

Item, %

HP-DDG

Conventional

DDGS

SEM

P-value

HP-DDG

Conventional

DDGS

SEM

P-value

CP

77.7

63.8

2.0

< 0.001

84.4

70.7

2.0

< 0.001

Indispensable AA

       

  Arg

86.7

72.8

2.3

< 0.001

92.0

79.1

2.3

< 0.001

  His

85.8

70.0

1.6

< 0.001

88.1

72.6

1.6

< 0.001

  Ile

84.4

70.2

1.3

< 0.001

87.3

73.6

1.3

< 0.001

  Leu

88.1

80.7

1.0

< 0.001

89.8

82.6

1.0

< 0.001

  Lys

81.0

55.7

1.8

< 0.001

84.8

60.2

1.8

< 0.001

  Met

87.7

78.2

0.9

< 0.001

89.4

80.1

0.9

< 0.001

  Phe

87.2

77.1

0.9

< 0.001

89.4

79.7

0.9

< 0.001

  Thr

77.7

61.3

1.7

< 0.001

82.6

66.7

1.7

< 0.001

  Trp

86.4

72.0

1.3

< 0.001

90.2

76.4

1.3

< 0.001

  Val

81.8

66.1

1.5

< 0.001

85.3

70.5

1.5

< 0.001

Total

85.0

72.0

1.3

< 0.001

88.0

75.5

1.3

< 0.001

Dispensable

AA

         

  Ala

82.0

73.3

1.7

< 0.001

85.7

77.3

1.7

< 0.001

  Asp

77.6

60.9

1.6

< 0.001

81.7

65.4

1.6

< 0.001

  Cys

80.4

65.2

1.6

< 0.001

83.9

68.8

1.6

< 0.001

  Glu

87.1

77.4

1.4

< 0.001

89.3

79.7

1.4

< 0.001

  Gly

58.7

39.9

5.0

< 0.001

75.5

58.7

5.0

< 0.001

  Pro

38.2

38.4

10.8

0.958

72.5

71.6

10.8

0.850

  Ser

82.2

69.0

1.8

< 0.001

86.3

73.5

1.8

< 0.001

  Tyr

87.5

79.1

0.8

< 0.001

90.3

81.9

0.8

< 0.001

Total

75.2

64.6

2.9

< 0.001

83.8

73.8

2.9

< 0.001

Total AA

79.8

67.9

2.1

< 0.001

85.8

74.5

2.1

< 0.001

b

b

b

b

b

b

b

b

 

1Values for SID were calculated by correcting the values for AID for basal ileal endogenous losses. Basal ileal endogenous losses were determined (g/kg of DMI) as CP, 11.91; Arg, 0.46; His, 0.12; Ile, 0.21; Leu, 0.34; Lys, 0.26; Met, 0.06; Phe, 0.20; Thr, 0.34; Trp, 0.07; Val, 0.36; Ala, 0.45; Asp, 0.51; Cys, 0.12; Glu, 0.62; Gly, 1.26; Pro, 4.35; Ser, 0.32; and Tyr, 0.17.

 

 

 

 

 

Authors: 
Publication Type: